Crestron Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

HDBaseT Interoperability Follies

Posted on 06:28 by Unknown
Welcome back to any AV followers who faded away last month while I was posting all fiction all the time. The stories and poems won't entirely go away but we'll start moving into a little better balance between pixels and ink for the nonce. Today I'd like to share a moment to discuss everyone's  favorite transport mechanism, HDBaseT.

For those not in the know, the HDBaseT alliance have defined HDBaseT as a technology for transport of video, audio, power, ethernet, and control over standard category cable. As a point-to-point (as opposed to routable) signals, HDBaseT cannot be routed with standard network switches. With offerings branded by major techm manufacturers (ie, Crestron's "Digital Media" and AMX "Enova" it has become a defacto standard for commercial systems.

Or has it?

The idea of a "standard" is that it should be manufacturer-agnostic. The HDMI output on a Sony Blu-ray player, for example, will work on the input of a Sharp LCD panel as well as it would on a Sony. Is that the case with HDBaseT? Is it, in other words, really a "standard"? The HDBaseT website does boast, in a large banner, that it is "The standard of the future", but the remainder of their text is much more cautious, referring to HDBaseT "technology" or "specifications". Can one grab an HDBaseT transmitter from one manufacturer and receiver from another and expect them  to work together? In an ideal world, the answer would be yes. Those of us who have wrestled with HDCP, EDID, or other HDMI-inspired headaches knows one thing for sure: this is not an ideal world.

For the sake of my own curiosity I tried a little experiment. I had access to transmitters from three major manufacturers: Crestron Digital Media, AMX DXLink, and Extron XTP. The latter is not, to the best of my knowledge, HDBaseT certified, so I'd not expect interoperability from it. The others are, so I would. Is that what happened? Not quite.

The AMX receiver gave me a "green screen of doom" when I tried to connect the Crestron or Extron transmitter to it. This is apparently an HDCP handshake error (as opposed to HDCP noncompliance, which would give a red screen of doom. Doom is the consistent part). This possibly has to do with how AMX handles HDCP authentication, which treats the receiver as a source rather than a repeater. This is nifty in that it bypasses the key limit in some sources (in other words you can run a single Blu-ray player to as many displays as you have outputs for, regardless of its key limit), but might make the receiver more picky in what it looks for from the source side.

This was a fairly disappointing result in that it left the non-HDBaseT certified Extron XTP as my only other receiver. IT might not be "certified", but it does use the same technology as HDBaseT transport solutions. Somewhat to my surprise the Crestron and AMX transmitters both sent HDCP protected content to the Extron XTP receiver. So much for certification.

What does this mean in practical terms? Not all that much. What it highlights is just how similar these devices are. Even in terms of form-factor you get a great deal of similarity between product lines; everyone has a standalone receiver about an inch or so deep to fit behind a flatpanel (or in a wall box), a similarly shaped standalone transmitter, a two-gang wall-mount transmitter,  and modular matrix frames sized from 8x8 up to 32x32 or larger. There's no real practical reason to step out of a single manufacturer's ecosystem other than to prove that you can. Now that we've done so, even that is gone.
A selection of transmitters and receivers

So how does one choose? We're the same place we were back when we did "Switcher-Wars" last year. Do you need Crestron's full audio and USB breakaway? AMX's smaller form-factor and better energy efficiency? Does an end-user with limited programming expertise want to be able to make equipment substitutions and other programming changes through Extron's Global Configurator or AMX's Rapid Project Maker? Is there an existing implementation of a remote-control and asset management system (Crestron Fusion, AMX RMS, Extron Global Viewer) into which you'd like your new system to tie? We've reached a point at which not only are the differences more subtle, but many of them won't even appear on a spec sheet.

The real take away here - for those who didn't realize it already - is confirmation  that the technology is very much the same. In fact, it's the same to the point that if one files off the serial numbers one would have a hard time even telling one apart from another. What this really means is that the best manufacturers aren't just selling the technology; they're selling a solution, including an ecosystem to fit around it and the thought they put in to some of the details that one might miss on a spec sheet.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in AMX, crestron, Digital Media, Enova, Extron, HDBaseT, Pixels, XTP | No comments
Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WHAT IS CRESTRON?
    Crestron is headquartered at Crestron Electronics, Inc . 15 Volvo DriveRockleigh, NJ 07647 Crestron Asia Ltd . Room 2501, 25/F, Westin Cen...
  • Do Crestron have any hardware?
    CRESTRON HARDWARE Unlike other automation hardware, Crestron has a wide range of products extending past touch panel interfaces. Their line...
  • Apple announces iPad 2 and iOS 4.3
    Apple announced the much anticipated iPad 2 today. The new tablet's design is 33 percent thinner and 15 percent lighter than the origina...
  • Women in AV (and everywhere else)
    "Daddy, do any girls work with you," -- Chloe, age 5 on the eve of Take Your Children to Work day (see  earlier blog post) I work,...
  • An afternoon visit with Extron
    I've not talked about Extron here recently since my visit to Anaheim for their training school nearly two years ago. Since then, two Inf...
  • Control 4 on "The View" on ABC
    Control4 on "The View" on ABC Dr. Gadgets just came back from the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas and shows us the co...
  • Difference between Crestron and Control4
    History of the Industry The industry started evolving rapidly back in the eighties. Two Control companies (Crestron and AMX) were the domin...
  • Back to School (or why no book reviews lately?)
    I've talked about AV, about writing, and about reading on here, but since April's review of Mary Robinette Kowal's Glamour in Gl...
  • My my, what a big screen you have!
    We've all seen them. Conference rooms the size of a walk-in closet in which the client wants (and the salesperson sold) a display the ap...
  • SONOS INTRODUCES THE PLAY:3
    SONOS INTRODUCES THE PLAY:3 Sonos has just introduced the SONOS PLAY:3, the compact, all-in-one Sonos player with wall-to-wall HiFi sound. U...

Categories

  • A
  • A to Z
  • ADA
  • AMX
  • arsitek
  • automation
  • AV
  • AVB
  • Baseball
  • Blog
  • Blog Hop
  • Blog Tour
  • Book Review
  • Books
  • BSFW
  • Carousel
  • certification
  • Clear One
  • commute
  • Constraints
  • consulting
  • coursera
  • crestron
  • D
  • design
  • Digital Media
  • Disney
  • E
  • Enova
  • Extron
  • F
  • feminism
  • fiction
  • flash
  • flash fiction
  • Friday Flash
  • G
  • Gaming
  • gender
  • Glamour in Glass
  • green AV
  • Guest Post
  • H
  • HDBaseT
  • Hearing
  • home
  • I
  • Infocomm
  • Infocomm 2013
  • Infocomm13
  • Ingress
  • Ink
  • integrasi
  • integration
  • J
  • K
  • Knowledge
  • Long Island City
  • luxury
  • M
  • May I?
  • Mets
  • Mic
  • Mobile
  • ModPo
  • N
  • Naomi's Story
  • Nightmare Fuel
  • O
  • Parenting
  • Passover
  • Pixels
  • Poetry
  • politics
  • Q
  • Quality
  • R
  • RA Dickey
  • Reading
  • review
  • reviews
  • Riley
  • Riley's Story
  • S
  • savant
  • school
  • SOPA
  • Sophie Duncan
  • storytelling
  • summer
  • SVSI
  • switchers
  • T
  • technology
  • tragedy
  • Training
  • TV
  • U
  • V
  • Video blogging
  • W
  • women in av
  • Work
  • Writing
  • X
  • XLR
  • XTP
  • Y
  • Yarnmen
  • year end
  • Z

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (51)
    • ▼  November (1)
      • HDBaseT Interoperability Follies
    • ►  October (29)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2012 (63)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (9)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2010 (6)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2007 (8)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile